<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Utility of Psychoreactive Drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allworkandnoplay.net/32/on-the-utility-of-psychoreactive-drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allworkandnoplay.net/32/on-the-utility-of-psychoreactive-drugs/</link>
	<description>Makes Jack Better Than You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 09:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: guess who</title>
		<link>http://allworkandnoplay.net/32/on-the-utility-of-psychoreactive-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>guess who</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allworkandnoplay.net/32/on-the-utility-of-psychoreactive-drugs/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>many things stimulate, depress, and alter mental states.  bottom line is that associating a positive change in mental state to a chemical substance is generally dangerous as it is a catalyst for addiction.  associating administration of a drug as a placebo for success is also dangerous because the effect is, partially, synthetic.  the relationship between memory and mood is probably more significant than substance administration alone.  addressing mood as a cognitive construct is a better path of psychological repair and enhancement and removes the threat of addiction. furthermore, those with a slight understanding of the modern threats of neurotechnology in general may not be aware of the possibility of action and consequence that they do not want as a result of their pursuit of feeling good.  this message would obviously be shunned by anyone profiting off of the human tendency for feel good thinking and behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many things stimulate, depress, and alter mental states.  bottom line is that associating a positive change in mental state to a chemical substance is generally dangerous as it is a catalyst for addiction.  associating administration of a drug as a placebo for success is also dangerous because the effect is, partially, synthetic.  the relationship between memory and mood is probably more significant than substance administration alone.  addressing mood as a cognitive construct is a better path of psychological repair and enhancement and removes the threat of addiction. furthermore, those with a slight understanding of the modern threats of neurotechnology in general may not be aware of the possibility of action and consequence that they do not want as a result of their pursuit of feeling good.  this message would obviously be shunned by anyone profiting off of the human tendency for feel good thinking and behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
